Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Is Theory Of Evolution That Determines Our Longivity?

 Why is life impermanent on earth? What happens to so many endearing personalities after their bodies are declared lifeless. What is the state known as LIFE? Seems that Nature revels in new creations. Is it because its earlier creations are not found perfect. Is it a pursuit towards perfection?


Then why are the lives of great legends in Science/ Arts/ Spirituality etc. cut short? Maybe our criteria of perfection are not the same as Nature's. The principle of evolution of species is a pursuit towards  perfection of SPECIES in alligning with Nature. When it comes to individuals in the species ( like us homo sapiens) the pursuit is towards perfection of each individual. We have NO IDEA about Nature's criterion!!! Like we are totally ignorant about the phenomenon called LIFE.


 Yes, then considering the limited space available on earth and more importantly due to the fact that imperfections could not be allowed to coexist with more perfect creations, putting an end to individual lives is quite logical.


So, NO SENSE in feeling SAD about the 'passing away' of people who were DEAR to us... 🙏

Samskrit Language, India's Invaluable Treasure.. How To Keep It Alive

 4)Sanskrit Language, India's 

Invaluable Treasure... How To Keep It Alive


I'm 85.  I've undergone a 4-semester course on Sanskrit language a couple of years ago, conducted by Seva Bhatati. A wonderful course that familiarises you with the 'deva bhasha' fairly in-depth. The course

honours you with the title 'Kovida'. I passed in the Uththama grade.


I gave the above introduction to claim some authority over what I'm going to write below.


I deeply love the language. Perhaps it is the oldest language of the world since the Vedas and Upanishats are written in that language.


Why was Sansrit not  adopted as India's national language for communication amongst all its subjects, when all spoken Indian languages are deeply related to it having imported freely words from it ( maybe in different degrees) Even Tamil which claims to be the oldest language of India has words from Sanskrit, in a distorted form due to the former's limited number of alphabets. e. g. 'choukiyam' for 'soukhyam'.


My perception is the following. The reason for not adopting it is that its presently not a 'spoken' language of India. It was perhaps one, once upon a time, maybe before the moghals started ruling India. To learn a language the natural way is to be born in a family where it is spoken. The next preferred way is for it to be taught COMPULSORILY from at least the 1st standard. To do that we need approval from a MAJORITY of citizens across India in order to conform to our DEMOCRATIC credentials.


The reason why Sanskrit is to be taught from the 1st standard is that its GRAMMAR is extremely complex. Panini the great grammarian of Sanskrit went deep into the concept of grammar. No living language is anywhere near Sanskrit in complexity. For example

1) the division of nouns as singular, DUAL and plural. 

2) the division of all nouns as male, female and GENDERLESS. That too while refering to inanimate objects

3)The 'vibhaktis' ( 'cases')which are 8 in number being DIFFERENT depending on the gender, cluster ( singular, dual, plural) of the noun to which they are attached. This is  most DIFFICULT to learn. Needs great memory power.

4) The segregation of all verbs as 'Atmanepati' and 'Parasmepati' without a clear criterion.

5) Verb endings in the three tenses being dependent on gender, the arbitrary segregation of 'atmanepati' and 'parasmepati'.

The list above is not exhaustive.

In short one's MEMORY POWER is what makes you an expert in this language. ( The positive aspect about this onservation is that mastery of Sanskrit language increases your memory power manyfold. Perhaps those who have mastered the language are automatically protected against Alzheimers!!!)


The great authors of our numerous puranas, religious texts, Sanskrit literary texts and innumerable ancient works on different aspects of life and universe are proven intellectuals. 'Intellect ' comprises of logic and memory. The emphasis on memory implicit in mastery of Sanskrit language may be one reason for ancient India's spectacular contributions to Mathematics, Astronomy and many other fields predating by several centuries the western discoveries.


The major difficulty that we face in re-introducing Sanskrit as a spoken language of India is the intricate grammar of the language. My viewpoint is that we have not allowed the language to EVOLVE over the thousands of years it existed. Every other spoken language has EVOLVED over time to reach its present state. For instance English. Its difficult to understand Old English. If we had let Sanskrit evolve over the thousands of years it existed it would've got rid of all the unnecessary complexities enumerated earlier in this note. For example, to mention a few...

1) The verbs need not depend on the non-unitary state of the subject or its gender.

2) The 'vibhaktis' ( case) also need not also depend on the above aspects of the subject.

3) The qualifiers of nouns need not also depend on the state or gender of noun.

and so on.


In this context it may be noted that in Malayalam ( which I know well being my mothertongue ) the above 3 rules are obeyed and hence compared with most other Indian languages its grammar is extremely simple.


One big advantage though of NOT letting Sanskrit evolve is that we can understand the old scriptures/ literature EXACTLY as they were intended to convey.


Hence my recommendation is to impose Sanskrit learning for Hindus as COMPULSARY from the 1st Standard in all schools. It can be optional for those who belong to other faiths.


....Permesh Nair








Aging And The Mind



I have been introspecting for a while now about the process of aging of the mind and the transformation that is happening in me who is 78 and possibly in many of us in the same age group.


In our younger days we have been keen observers and learners of minutiae in every subject we were interested in. For instance in our school and college days we learned subjects in Science and Technology ( those who specialised in  Science and Engineering subjects, for example) intensely concentrating on every detail.


 After education once we entered our professional careers these details faded away from our minds leaving behind an overall idea of the concepts basing on which we acquired professional skills that were required to execute tasks at our workplaces. Very many things that we learned in detail depending on the demand on hand at the workplace also gradually faded away with their essence staying on in the mind.


 This seems to be  a continuous process as we encounter new situations until age catches up with us. It is understandable since there are only a finite number of neurons in our brain and they can't be ecpected to hold infinite amount of information  and they need to either discard or at least codify part of their contents in order to take in new information.


Once age catches up we don't go into the details of even the current task on hand. We gradually tend to evade tasks that need close scrutiny and intense involvement. In an organisation you leave such tasks to the younger members of the team and you do the overall supervision and control. Perhaps it is in recognition of this process of evolution of aging mind that in an organisation's hierarchy the top posts are reserved for 'senior' folks. In a family the elderly people are gradually sidetracked and relegated to responsibilities that do not need intense involvement, constant attention and acute alertness. The so-called spiritual/philosophical disposition that one develops towards the later years  is in line with this natural transformation of mind as it ages. 


This process of evolution is absolutely natural and perhaps conforms to the progressive physiological process of lowering of neural population in the brain. In the course of such evolution mind tends to gradually retract from it's basic faculties that empower it to delve deep into details which are pronounced in early years and to reshape itself by acquiring a tendency to generalise and engage itself in generalities on all its involvements. It is thus a journey from details to generalities as one ages. 


The distant gaze into the empty space that very aged people generally are seen to indulge in is perhaps a symptom of this tendency of the mind to run away from the details of the foreground scene.


The ability to come to generalisation after filtering through the details of an issue is considered to be a faculty indicative of high degree of intelligence. So in a certain sense the compulsion of aging that leads to a tendency of generalisation is up to a point a positive faculty. It becomes a sign of degradation of power of comprehension only when you start losing the faculty of detailed study. Alzheimer's in a sense is not too deviant a phenomenon when one realises that aging causes gradual withdrawal of the mind from  its basic ability to delve into details. It is a well-known fact of brain physiology that neurons die away when they are NOT being used and conversely if there is NEED for them, fresh neurons take birth to meet the requirement. So the aging gets accelerated when we are satisfied with generalities alone to the extent of shunning the details altogether. 


To reverse aging of brain, therefore, we need to deliberately engage the mind in the study of details in one or the other of our interests. Such a practice may help us to keep the Alzheimer's at bay. Hence it may be very useful for all of us to learn something new deliberately and to remain mentally active, even if it is not going to be of any mundane use to us, just to keep mentally healthy as we age.


I am therefore consciously doing that and I would urge, if you are convinced of my rationale presented above, all of you my FB friends in my age group to do the same. I'm trying to learn new things. I could also perhaps continue to teach. Hope to be able to fight the debilitating aspects of aging to some extent. 


The flooding of our lives by the modern technological gadgets like the Smart Phone is indeed a boon and we must attempt to use them intelligently and exploit it's myriad features which will not only stimulate our aging brain but also serve us as a powerful medium of interaction with today's youth through the ubiquitous social tools such as Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, Instagram and the like.


Another issue I'm conscious of, that is attributable to aging , is about the difficulty, (which is widely expressed ) to recall fast enough the names of familiar people, places, sometimes vocabulary etc. The reason is apparently the same, namely, shrinking of the neuron population. Again partial remedy can be found by deliberately commiting them to memory after we recall them and inventing more and more occasions to use them.


Yet another observation that has struck me is that as we age, at the emotional level, we tend to nurture the so-called higher or 'satwik' emotions such as kindness, empathy,  understanding, pardoning attitude, helping attitude, charity and so on. As Bhagavat Geeta asserts that all of Nature is the outcome of the play of 3 'Gunas' ( Tamas, Rajas and Satwa) and it is impossible to completely  get rid of them by our volition, except that a true Yogi's  effort should be to outgrow them. However, every individual has the liberty  to decide what to cultivate more in the process of his evolution. My experience is, which I believe may be the experience of a majority,  that the brain automatically tries to cultivate 'satwa' as it ages.


 ( Let me make it clear at this juncture that I'm not a  religious person in the conventional sense except that I firmly believe in the existence of a Universal Intelligence that oversees this mysterious phenomenon we know as 'life' and this infinite cosmos of matter and energy all of which obey precise laws  and tread this mysterious track of Time which has no beginning or end!!! Science has been able only to scratch on the sensorily perceptible miniscule part of this unfathomable incomprehensible entity! I also believe in the possibility of that Intelligence being generally benign to its creations, as are we to our creations, or in other words I believe it to be essentially 'satwik'. )


 While the brain tends to withdraw from details and meticulous analyses, which are functions of the left half of the brain, our attitude seems to draw from the faculties attributed to the right half such as the emotions mentioned above. Is it that the linkage mechanism connecting the two halves becomes more effective as we age?

Rebirth Propounded By Hinduism Is Truly Rational

 2)Re

Today a thought was passing through my mind...How Nature is hoodwinking us...


The day

 starts with the beautiful sunrise in the morning ( of course depending on the season) then gradually the scorching noon then the pleasant evening with colourful sunset and in the end concludes with a rejuvenating night... Again the cycle repeats. We get a false feeling that we haven't lost any time because the daily cycle repeats endlessly. What if I couldn't get a job done today. Exactly similar day is repeating tomorrow... So are the seasons.. Summer, monsoon, spring, winter   ( depending on the region on earth) which repeat next year.


However, though I'm able to get fresh days and seasons endlessly and hence apparently have no sense of loss I REALISE that TIME is taking a toll on me.


 From the gleeful childhood days to romantic youth I'm g.. r.. a.. d.. u.. a.. l.. l..y entering the not so pleasant middle age and then agony-ridden old age and finally am bound to end up in the grave.


Why couldn't Nature make my aging also cyclic?!! After old age  why can't Nature take me to childhood, youth, middle age and yet again to old age without end just like the recurring days and recurring  seasons ???


When I think further, I realise that  there is a stark difference between repetitive cycles of days/ seasons and the lack of similar cycle of aging I blamed Nature about. In the former the evening turns to the morning of the next day after an UNKNOWN reversal of the cycle that happens in the MYSTERY of the night. To simulate that in the process of aging the old man cannot abruptly tranform to a child. He HAS to end up in the grave and then the MYSTERY of re-birth has to happen in a womb to be born as a child and to repeat the cycle...


So the re-birth  which Hinduism propounds is the answer of Nature to the question as to why there is no REVERSAL of the aging process when alive.

Nature's Ploy To Enable Females Among Humans To Be Sexually More Attractive Than Males

 This piece of writing is once again my pondering about Nature.


In the first look it may appear to be outwardly a little obscene to some, particulaly women, because I'm going to put out my thoughts about the anatomy of female gender among humans.


 But such people should be aware that Medical Books on Anatomy discuss genitals of both genders and that is not considered obscene.


The upper body of the female gender of humanoids is in stark contrast with that of other species. (The humanoids include humans and apes who are able to walk on two limbs. ) In the upper part, what distinguishes the humanoid from other species is the positioning of breasts that feed the offsprings in their babyhood. In all other animal species they are positioned below the abdoman. Look at cows, goats, buffalos etc.


Why has Nature chosen a different configuration in humanoid, particularly humans? The only logic I find is that Nature wants to project the breasts as  sexually stimulating organs, while functionally they are feeding organs, thus playing a dual role. (Modern female costume designers exploit the former role.)


 Another aspect Nature has meticulously projected in human females is the hairlessness in the face and other exposed parts of the body except the scalp, where it grows abundantly and adds to the aesthetics, which feature is in utter contrast with human males. Even the facial features are dainty in a human famale in contrast with human male. So are all the limbs and the entire body.


Thus in humans the female gender is CREATED as visually FAR MORE AESTHETIC than the male gender. ( This is not just a male point of view because we generally see males covering their entire bodies with clothing, however muscular they be. Not so females.)


In contrast look at other species. In animals a he-lion is majestic visually with its imposing mane unlike the she-lion which lacks it. In the peacock species the male is endowed with beautiful long colourful plumes and skill to dance spreading its plumes. Amongst house birds like cock and hen the cock is majestically attired

with its plume of colouful feathers at the back and the pink headgear.


An interesting fact among these species is the process of males attracting the females for sexual union. Among birds like peacock, the male enters into a long dance sequence to impress the ordinary-looking female. At the end of it, IF the female yields,  THEN and ONLY THEN  there is mating. We don't see the male CHASING the female.


In stark contrast  in the so-called EVOLVED species like humans the male mostly forces himself into sexual union irrespective of female's willingness!!!